15311, the wires under the street, and city data
The short version: 311 is the non-emergency front door to city government in the US and Canada: a phone number that grew into apps and websites for reporting potholes, graffiti and missed trash pickups. Behind it sits a layer of private telecom in and on the street, from small cell antennas on streetlights to buildings where internet networks meet. Cities increasingly publish the data these systems produce, and some have tried to wire whole districts with sensors. Who controls that data, and what the city is allowed to do with it, has turned out to be the hard part.
What is 311 and when did it start?
311 is a three-digit number, and now usually an app and website as well, for non-emergency city services and information. It started as a way to take pressure off 911. Baltimore, Maryland, launched the first 311 service on October 2, 1996, for police non-emergency and information calls.91
A few months later the federal government made it national. The FCC's First Report and Order FCC 97-51, adopted February 18, 1997, and in effect from March 28, 1997, assigned 311 across the US for non-emergency police and other government services. The same order assigned 711 for relay services.321
Other countries chose their own numbers:
- Canada: the regulator, the CRTC, reserved 311 on November 5, 2004, and Calgary launched first, on May 18, 2005.91
- Germany: 115 is the government services number.91
- UK: 101 is the number for non-emergency police.91
How it changed: from hotline to service desk
The model that most big cities copied came from New York. NYC311 launched in March 2003.91 Its biggest single day came on December 20, 2005, the first day of a transit strike, when it took a record 240,000 calls.91 By then 311 was less a police overflow line than the place people called when the city itself had stopped working.
By fiscal year 2026, NYC311 handled far more than phone calls:322
| Channel or measure (NYC311, FY2026) | Figure |
|---|---|
| Phone calls | 16.609 million (down from 18.231 million in FY2022) |
| Mobile app contacts | 2.841 million |
| Text messages | 326,000 |
| Website visits | 17.6 million |
| Completed service requests | 4.107 million |
| Average Tier 1 phone wait | 43 seconds |
| Languages on the phone line | 175, 24 hours a day |
Falling call counts alongside large app and web numbers suggest a shift from phone to digital channels, though one city's figures cannot prove a national pattern.
Open311. Each city's 311 system started as its own software, which made it hard for outside apps to file requests. On March 3, 2010, US Federal CIO Vivek Kundra announced Open311, a uniform API, an open standard for submitting and tracking service requests.91 The UK's FixMyStreet, a citizen reporting site, uses it.91 In plain terms, Open311 lets a request typed into a third-party app land in the same queue as one phoned in to the city.
In Boston: Citizens Connect and the 311 app
Boston was early to the smartphone version. A July 2009 report described Citizens Connect, an iPhone app conceived by mayoral aide Nigel Jacob and built by Connected Bits, a New Hampshire company, for a $25,000 support fee.89 The flow it set up is still the basic pattern for city reporting apps: a resident photographs a problem such as graffiti or a pothole, the phone's GPS records the location, and the resident gets a tracking number to follow the request.89
The app launched in October 2009 as Citizens Connect and is now called BOS:311.323 The renaming came on August 11, 2015, when Mayor Martin J. Walsh launched BOS:311 and existing Citizens Connect users were upgraded automatically.324 Reports from the app made up 6% of all service requests tracked in the city's systems in 2010 and roughly 28% by 2014.323 The city publishes the reports filed through the app as a downloadable dataset on its open data portal.323 WBUR counted 287,148 Boston 311 requests in 2024 through December 10; parking was the most common category, at 60,423, followed by street cleaning, at 21,873.325
Why are there antennas on streetlights?
Look up at a city streetlight or wooden utility pole and you may see a gray box or cylinder that is not a light. That is often a small cell, a low-power cell site that adds mobile capacity over a short range. 5G signals travel short distances, so carriers need many small sites, often on streetlights, utility poles or buildings.54 (More on the poles themselves in How streetlights work.)
Each of those sites sits on public property or in the public right of way, which gives cities a say. In the US, the FCC limited that say in its small cell order, adopted September 26, 2018, and in effect from January 14, 2019:54
- Shot clocks: cities get 60 days to decide on attaching a small cell to an existing structure and 90 days for a new structure.
- Fees: presumptively lawful fees are up to $500 one-time and $270 per year per site.
Municipalities challenged the order in court, in the Ninth Circuit.54 Broadly, the dispute was over local control versus speed of deployment: carriers and the FCC argued for faster, cheaper permitting, and cities argued for keeping authority over their streets and fees.
On August 12, 2020, the Ninth Circuit upheld most of the order, including the fee limits and shot clocks, in City of Portland v. United States.326 It struck down two of the order's tests for local aesthetic rules: that they be "objective" and "no more burdensome" than rules for other infrastructure.326 The US Supreme Court declined to hear the case on June 28, 2021.326
The wires under the street
The visible antennas are the end of a much larger network. Under most city streets run conduits carrying fiber and copper for phone companies, cable companies and the city's own systems, and in older cities such as Boston the fire alarm boxes still run on their own wired loops, separate from the phone and power networks.78 (Their history is in From fire alarm boxes to 911.)
The companies that use those conduits need the city's permission. In Boston, the city is the licensing authority for cable television, and its Broadband and Cable Office works with Verizon (Fios), Comcast (Xfinity) and Astound (RCN) on their license agreements.327 Comcast of Boston has held one of the city's cable franchises since July 17, 2002, and when a license comes up for renewal the city takes public comment and reviews the operator's service quality and complaint handling.327
Whether cities should run their own internet service is contested in the US. A BroadbandNow report, last updated in July 2025, counted 16 states with laws that substantially hinder municipal broadband networks.328 Supporters cite networks such as Chattanooga's municipal fiber as a way to add competition and close the digital divide; incumbent telecom companies have lobbied and campaigned against such projects in several states.328
Where does Boston's internet meet?
Data does not travel from your phone to a website on one company's wires. Networks hand traffic to each other, and they do it in specific buildings. A carrier hotel is a building where many telecom networks place equipment and interconnect. Inside, an internet exchange point (IXP) is a shared switch where networks swap traffic directly instead of paying a third party to carry it.
In Boston, that place is One Summer Street, a datacenter run by Markley Group. The Boston Internet Exchange runs there, with a second site in Lowell; it went online in 2012 and has 48 members.90 In practice, traffic between two networks that both connect there can stay in Boston instead of making a round trip through New York or Virginia.
What is open data?
An open data portal is a government website that publishes datasets for anyone to download and reuse. Boston's, Analyze Boston, went live on April 6, 2017, after a beta in February.329 The city's Analytics Team and its Department of Innovation and Technology built it on CKAN with OpenGov.329 At launch it held about 115 datasets, including CityScore, food inspections and public safety data, all with API access and public domain licensing.329
Smart cities: sensors, platforms and digital twins
"Smart city" covers several very different ideas. Three examples show the range.
An open sensor platform: Barcelona. Sentilo is an open-source platform for sensors and actuators, sponsored by Barcelona City Council's Municipal Institute of Informatics.330 It grew out of a smart city strategy begun in November 2011, with a platform start date of January 2014, and it is dual-licensed under the EUPL and LGPL so other cities can reuse it.330 Barcelona tested noise, air, traffic and waste sensors.330
A digital twin: Singapore. A digital twin is a detailed digital model of a city or system used to simulate and plan changes. Virtual Singapore launched on December 3, 2014, as part of the country's Smart Nation program, and was completed in 2022.331 It was co-led by the National Research Foundation, the Singapore Land Authority and GovTech, and built on Dassault Systèmes' 3DEXPERIENCE City software.331 Its uses include planning, flood management, and simulations of wind, noise and traffic.331
A private master plan: Toronto. Sidewalk Labs pulled out of Toronto's 12-acre (5 hectare) Quayside waterfront project in May 2020.332 CEO Dan Doctoroff cited "unprecedented economic uncertainty" from the pandemic, and the project had drawn criticism, with disputes that included who would own its intellectual property and data.332
Our reading of the three: sensors and software are cheap compared with the governance around them. Barcelona made its platform open-source and city-sponsored; Singapore built its model under government agencies; Toronto's project ended with unresolved questions about who would own and control the data, alongside the economic reasons the company gave.
Is Boston using facial recognition?
Cameras and sensors raise a question that open data portals do not: what the city may collect about people, not about potholes. Cities have answered it differently, and the debate is ongoing.
On June 24, 2020, the Boston City Council voted unanimously to ban city use of facial surveillance, including obtaining it through third parties.333 The measure was sponsored by Councilors Ricardo Arroyo and Michelle Wu.333 It does not cover private companies or federal agencies.333 Police Commissioner William Gross said at the time that the department did not use the technology: "Until this technology is 100%, I'm not interested in it."333 WBUR reported that the vote made Boston the second-largest community in the world to ban the technology, after San Francisco.333
This guide takes no side in the wider debate; the record above is what Boston decided.
What's changing now (2026)
- Phone to app. NYC311's calls fell from 18.231 million in FY2022 to 16.609 million in FY2026, while app, text and web contacts ran into the millions.322
- Small cells under federal limits. The FCC's 2018 shot clocks and fee limits still shape how fast antennas go up on US streetlights.54
- Digital twins as finished tools. Virtual Singapore moved from launch in 2014 to completion in 2022, and is now used for flood and planning work.331
- Open data keeps growing. Analyze Boston started with about 115 datasets in 2017.329
As of October 2026, Analyze Boston lists 235 datasets.334
Quick answers
What is the difference between 911 and 311?
911 is for emergencies. 311, first launched in Baltimore in 1996 and reserved nationwide by the FCC in 1997, is for non-emergency police and city services such as reporting potholes.
Sources for this section
19 of the guide's 398 sources. Numbers match the full reference list.
-
Congressional Research Service via EveryCRSReport: Legal Sidebar LSB10265 on the FCC small cell order - everycrsreport.com ↩↩↩↩↩↩
-
ETHW: Milestones:Electric Fire Alarm System, 1852 - ethw.org ↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩
-
Christian Science Monitor: Spot graffiti or a pothole? Report it with your iPhone - csmonitor.com ↩↩↩↩↩
-
Wikipedia: Boston Internet Exchange - en.wikipedia.org ↩↩↩
-
Wikipedia: 311 (telephone number) - en.wikipedia.org ↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩
-
Federal Register: FCC First Report and Order 97-51, Vol. 62 No. 38 (Feb 26, 1997) - govinfo.gov ↩
-
City of Boston: BOS:311 app - boston.gov ↩↩↩
-
Centre for Public Impact: Accessing Boston's non-emergency services via BOS:311 - centreforpublicimpact.org ↩
-
WBUR: The 411 on 311 - Counting the pothole, pest and parking complaints of 2024 (January 1, 2025) - wbur.org ↩
-
Davis Wright Tremaine: Ninth Circuit Upholds FCC's 2018 Small Cell, Local Moratoria, and One-Touch Make-Ready Orders - dwt.com ↩↩↩
-
City of Boston: Cable options in Boston - boston.gov ↩↩
-
BroadbandNow: Municipal Broadband Remains Roadblocked in 16 States - broadbandnow.com ↩↩
-
Microsoft New England: Analyze Boston, New Open Data Hub, Helps Citizens Visualize Their Lives - blogs.microsoft.com ↩↩↩↩↩
-
Interoperable Europe: Sentilo sensor and actuator platform for smart cities - interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu ↩↩↩
-
Wikipedia: Virtual Singapore - en.wikipedia.org ↩↩↩↩
-
Fortune: Sidewalk Labs pulls out of Toronto waterfront Quayside project - fortune.com ↩↩
-
WBUR: Boston City Council bans city use of facial recognition - wbur.org ↩↩↩↩↩
-
Analyze Boston (City of Boston): Datasets - data.boston.gov ↩